The decision: management first
Inoculation is not a universal remedy. This logic fixes the chemistry, then the management, and only then reaches for biology, for a specific function.
What is driving this result
Every factor's measured contribution. Red worsens, green helps, straight from the values you entered.
Model-estimated and indicative. This is an expert-encoded model built on the citation-verified factor knowledge base, not yet a data-trained predictor. Thresholds follow standard agronomy (e.g. lime when Al saturation > 20% or pH < 5.3). It guides diagnosis; it does not replace a soil scientist or field trial. The data-trained version is the next build.
Characteristic microbes in soils like yours
Genera that show up more often in corpus soils sharing your chemistry than in the rest, the taxa that distinguish this kind of soil. This is enrichment, not raw abundance, and widespread generalists that occur in almost every soil (for example Clostridium, Bacillus, Sphingomonas) are filtered out. It reads live from the reprocessed corpus.
Indicative, read from the live corpus. Presence of specific taxa is measured directly and does not depend on any diversity score. pH here is partly measured on your sample and partly inferred; genus tables are early-version. These are corpus patterns, not proof of cause or of a function in your field. The view sharpens as more of the corpus is reprocessed.
Calculated as prevalence = (soils with the genus ÷ soils in this band) × 100 , listed only when enriched vs the rest of the corpus.